I’m interested in looking
how people are changing their writing in relation to online audiences in social
spaces. I want to particularly focus on how rhetorical awareness of audience
could be changing. Here are questions I want to explore:
·
Are internet
users hyperaware of who their audiences are? How do they know to say different
things in different spaces? Or why do they not know?
·
Related, how
are internet users approaching or reading their audience?
·
Are users
writing for “lurkers”? Or does the concept of “lurkers” alter what is written
in some spaces?
·
Do users
imagine their audience or do they alter what they say as a precaution?
·
How is
audience controlled? How is it uncontrollable?
·
How do users
write when we can’t control or aren’t sure of these audiences?
The tie to pedagogy is a
bit shaky. Obviously audience is a rhetorical concept we teach, but how is that
audience different from the online concept of audience? Why is it sometimes
easier to decipher who the online audience consists of rather than in print
readings? Can the skill of writing for a particular online audience transfer
into the classroom? Should it also transfer in how we approach audience in our
field? (If you read my blog post before this, my answer would be yes.)
This idea stems from my
obsession with online social habits. I really wonder if people’s writing habits
are changing in online spaces, and if so, how. And if they are changing, how
should we approach the teaching of writing? The second reason I came to this
topic was because I say different things in different spaces. Facebook is
personal to me (college friends, professors, family) while Twitter is somewhat
personal, but also includes a lot of strangers (because I decide who can follow
me.) Am I reading that audience? Yes, but then how do I know how to do that?) Somewhat,
because I control it? Not at all, because they are strangers?
No comments:
Post a Comment