I’m particularly
interested in the way Collin Brooke suggests meaning making is changing because
of internet practices. He references Scott Lloyd DeWitt’s concept of reading as
an “Impulsive Model” which reflects the fast-paced surfing internet users might
do. Brooke further links this to Dewitt’s idea of “cognitive fabric” which is
the weaving together various texts of information to create a pattern. Brooke
relates it to memory, or his term persistence, and argues that these patterns
are a way to outline or shape a set of texts: “Persistence as a memory practice
is the ability to build and maintain patterns, although those patterns may be
tentative and ultimately fade into the background” (157).
Could this be a new way to
learn? Should we incorporate this kind of meaning-making and the retaining of
information through patterns into the writing classroom? If so, how do we
incorporate this new type of learning?
(I think about 102 more since it has a greater amount of texts that must
be read for research purposes.)
Another concept found in
Brooke’s text is “containerism” (93-7). Brooke suggsts we should break free
from the sequentiality of traditional texts. He quotes David Kolb who suggests
forms to do this (tangles, sieves, split/joints…whatever those are) that are
“patterns that demonstrate a variety of rhetorical effects that are possible if
we think beyond the container model” (96). My concern is how we would go about
teaching these patterns if we were assigning a multimodal project. At what
point does pattern (arrangement) become less about logic and more about design?
How can we make that distinction?
Unrelated to Brooke, I am
lost as to what constitutes a network according to Galloway and Thacker (who
never seem to define it?). I don’t understand how a network is
different/similar to community.
Baym frames community with
five parts: space, practice, shared resources and support, shared identities, and
interpersonal relationships (74-90). She then discusses networked
individualism, “in which each person sits at the center of his or her own
personal community” (90). How can her concepts be compared and contrasted with
Galloway and Thacker?
No comments:
Post a Comment